Thursday, June 22, 2006

Schools fail nutrition report card; 23 states get an F

Almost half of all states received a failing grade in a school foods report card issued Tuesday by a nonprofit group that evaluated school nutrition policies.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest, based in Washington, D.C., gave an F to 23 states and a D to eight others after evaluating school policies regarding foods and beverages sold in campus vending machines, school stores and school fundraisers.

Only one state, Kentucky, scored an A, or actually, an A-.

Five states got a B+ — Nevada, Arkansas, New Mexico, Alabama and California. New Jersey, Arizona and Tennessee each got a B, and four others — Louisiana, West Virginia, Connecticut and Florida — earned a B-.

| | | | | | |

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Diabetes rate doubles in U.S.; Americans not even in top 25 of "healthy" countries

Today's headlines screamed out: "Diabetes rate doubles over last 30 years: Higher incidence of type 2 blamed on obesity, lifestyle changes."

Blamed on obesity? Like that tells us anything....


How about:
  • In 1967, Americans ate 114 pounds of raw or refined sugar and a trifling amount of other sweeteners per year, per person. In 2003, the amount of sugar eaten per person jumped to 142 pounds, plus an additional 61 pounds of high-fructose corn syrup, a sugar product now used to sweeten everything from ketchup and soda pop to ranch dressing.
  • Since 1950, soft-drink consumption per capita has quadrupled, from about 11 gallons per year to about 46 gallons in 2003 — nearly a gallon a week per person.
  • The calories from those soft drinks alone account for 16% of the calories an adult consumes, and over 20% of the average teenager's calories come from soft drinks.
  • Per person, in 2003 Americans consumed about 8.3 pounds of broccoli and barely 25 pounds of dark lettuces (not that iceburg crap we've been conditioned to think of as "lettuce").

In the 1970s, the incidence of diabetes was the lowest, at 2.0 percent among women and 2.7 percent among men. By the 1990s, the corresponding rates had climbed to their highest points: 3.7 percent and 5.8 percent.

Are we burning off those calories? According to the A.C. Nielsen Co. in 1998, the average American was watching 3 hours and 46 minutes of TV each day (more than 52 days of nonstop TV-watching per year). In 2001, average daily TV watching exceeded four hours. By age 65 the average American will have spent over nine years glued to the tube.

But we exercise more, right?
  • Over 60% of American adults are not regularly active
  • 25% of adults are not active at all
  • Only 19% of high school students are active for 20 minutes or more per day

But surely, we're the healthiest country in the world, right?
  • On average, the citizens of 29 countries are less overweight than those of the United States, including New Zealand, Mexico, Finland, Israel, Canada, Australia, Ireland, Peru, Sweden, Belgium and Brazil
  • Infant mortality rates in several countries are substantially less than the rate in the United States, including Hong Kong (2.3 deaths per 1,000 live births), Japan (3.0 deaths), Sweden (2.8 deaths), France (4.1 deaths), Germany (4.3 deaths), Spain (3.4 deaths), Czech Republic (4.2 deaths), Italy (4.7 deaths), Canada (5.4 deaths), Australia (5.0 deaths), the United Kingdom (5.2 deaths) and Cuba (6.5 deaths)
  • Today, 28 countries have healthy life expectancies that exceed the United States, including the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, France, Germany and Japan. The highest, Japan, exceeds the United States by more than five years, meaning that the average newborn child in Japan can expect to have more than five additional years in which to enjoy a healthy, active life.
But hey... We're Number One! in number of McDonalds, Burger King, Wendy's, Dairy Queen, Pizza Hut, Domino's, Taco Bell, Coca-Cola, Pepsi, Mountain Dew, ad nauseum.

Sources:
MSNBC; U.S. News & World Report; TV Free America; Sourcebook for Teaching Science; Surgeon General's Report on Exercise, 1996, as discussed at Mahoning County District (Ohio) Department of Health; United Health Federation, quoting March of Dimes and World Health Organization statistics

| | | | | | |

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Medical system called "in crisis," "in shambles"

Like you need another one more reason to stay healthy?

The American emergency medical system is in crisis, says the Insitute of Medicine, as reported in today's Medical News Today.
[I]t is seriously short of resources, fragmented and splitting at the seams. Ambulances are commonly turned away from emergency departments, it is not unusual for patients to have to wait for hours and/or days for a bed. The whole system would fall apart if it had to deal with disasters or outbreaks.
"We were at capacity at 9 a.m. this morning, and we'll stay that way probably until 3 a.m. tomorrow," Dr. Robert Fuller, clinical chief of emergency medicine at the University of Connecticut Health Center in Farmington, said Wednesday.

Emergency rooms are overwhelmed.

"We're like a series of pans of water, all connected and all nearly full," Fuller said. "Throw a bucket of water into one, and we'd all overflow."

The IOM report said among the problems are:
  • Emegency rooms are seriously overcrowded
  • Patients have to wait for a long time to be admitted
  • Ambulances are often turned away from emergency departments
  • A chronic shortage of specialists to provide care many emergency rooms
  • Ambulance transport to emergency medical services is generally fragmented, chaotic and inconsistent
To see the original press release and the IOM's original reports, visit the National Academies website.

| | | | | | |

Monday, June 05, 2006

Splenda -- How sweet it isn't: If artificial sugar is so splendid, how come we aren't thin?

Time magazine's current issue has an article about the dangers of Splenda you should read.

Here are some comments about Splenda and the call for hearings on its dangers, written by my friend Elwood Richard, founder of NOW Foods:

From El Richard:

Citizens for Health is asking for support for their petition for a public hearing on Splenda. I agree that objective technical information should be presented not only on Splenda, but every new chemical product that is introduced into our food supply. The Time magazine article (see link) gives some background on Splenda.

Splenda is one of the chemicals about which my biochemistry professor warned us. He said that the carbon chlorine bond is a very strong bond, and that as the carbon linked entity goes thru a host of reactions, the chlorine will remain attached in most of them. Eventually it is likely that some of the carbon chlorine bonded products will metabolize into one of the many toxic carbon chlorine compounds.

As with every novel chemical product that is proposed for introduction into our food supply, the firm owning the patent has a large financial interest in getting approval, and will have a good amount of contract research showing its safety. The public needs to be protected by having good independent research to assure that the contract research is valid.

A public hearing gives independent researchers a chance to be heard.

Elwood Richard, Founder
Now Foods

Read about Splenda at Citizens for Health

Read the Time article titled "How Sweet It Isn't: If artificial sugar is so splendid, why aren't we thin?"

| | | | | |