Thursday, June 22, 2006

Schools fail nutrition report card; 23 states get an F

Almost half of all states received a failing grade in a school foods report card issued Tuesday by a nonprofit group that evaluated school nutrition policies.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest, based in Washington, D.C., gave an F to 23 states and a D to eight others after evaluating school policies regarding foods and beverages sold in campus vending machines, school stores and school fundraisers.

Only one state, Kentucky, scored an A, or actually, an A-.

Five states got a B+ — Nevada, Arkansas, New Mexico, Alabama and California. New Jersey, Arizona and Tennessee each got a B, and four others — Louisiana, West Virginia, Connecticut and Florida — earned a B-.

| | | | | | |

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Diabetes rate doubles in U.S.; Americans not even in top 25 of "healthy" countries

Today's headlines screamed out: "Diabetes rate doubles over last 30 years: Higher incidence of type 2 blamed on obesity, lifestyle changes."

Blamed on obesity? Like that tells us anything....


How about:
  • In 1967, Americans ate 114 pounds of raw or refined sugar and a trifling amount of other sweeteners per year, per person. In 2003, the amount of sugar eaten per person jumped to 142 pounds, plus an additional 61 pounds of high-fructose corn syrup, a sugar product now used to sweeten everything from ketchup and soda pop to ranch dressing.
  • Since 1950, soft-drink consumption per capita has quadrupled, from about 11 gallons per year to about 46 gallons in 2003 — nearly a gallon a week per person.
  • The calories from those soft drinks alone account for 16% of the calories an adult consumes, and over 20% of the average teenager's calories come from soft drinks.
  • Per person, in 2003 Americans consumed about 8.3 pounds of broccoli and barely 25 pounds of dark lettuces (not that iceburg crap we've been conditioned to think of as "lettuce").

In the 1970s, the incidence of diabetes was the lowest, at 2.0 percent among women and 2.7 percent among men. By the 1990s, the corresponding rates had climbed to their highest points: 3.7 percent and 5.8 percent.

Are we burning off those calories? According to the A.C. Nielsen Co. in 1998, the average American was watching 3 hours and 46 minutes of TV each day (more than 52 days of nonstop TV-watching per year). In 2001, average daily TV watching exceeded four hours. By age 65 the average American will have spent over nine years glued to the tube.

But we exercise more, right?
  • Over 60% of American adults are not regularly active
  • 25% of adults are not active at all
  • Only 19% of high school students are active for 20 minutes or more per day

But surely, we're the healthiest country in the world, right?
  • On average, the citizens of 29 countries are less overweight than those of the United States, including New Zealand, Mexico, Finland, Israel, Canada, Australia, Ireland, Peru, Sweden, Belgium and Brazil
  • Infant mortality rates in several countries are substantially less than the rate in the United States, including Hong Kong (2.3 deaths per 1,000 live births), Japan (3.0 deaths), Sweden (2.8 deaths), France (4.1 deaths), Germany (4.3 deaths), Spain (3.4 deaths), Czech Republic (4.2 deaths), Italy (4.7 deaths), Canada (5.4 deaths), Australia (5.0 deaths), the United Kingdom (5.2 deaths) and Cuba (6.5 deaths)
  • Today, 28 countries have healthy life expectancies that exceed the United States, including the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, France, Germany and Japan. The highest, Japan, exceeds the United States by more than five years, meaning that the average newborn child in Japan can expect to have more than five additional years in which to enjoy a healthy, active life.
But hey... We're Number One! in number of McDonalds, Burger King, Wendy's, Dairy Queen, Pizza Hut, Domino's, Taco Bell, Coca-Cola, Pepsi, Mountain Dew, ad nauseum.

Sources:
MSNBC; U.S. News & World Report; TV Free America; Sourcebook for Teaching Science; Surgeon General's Report on Exercise, 1996, as discussed at Mahoning County District (Ohio) Department of Health; United Health Federation, quoting March of Dimes and World Health Organization statistics

| | | | | | |

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Medical system called "in crisis," "in shambles"

Like you need another one more reason to stay healthy?

The American emergency medical system is in crisis, says the Insitute of Medicine, as reported in today's Medical News Today.
[I]t is seriously short of resources, fragmented and splitting at the seams. Ambulances are commonly turned away from emergency departments, it is not unusual for patients to have to wait for hours and/or days for a bed. The whole system would fall apart if it had to deal with disasters or outbreaks.
"We were at capacity at 9 a.m. this morning, and we'll stay that way probably until 3 a.m. tomorrow," Dr. Robert Fuller, clinical chief of emergency medicine at the University of Connecticut Health Center in Farmington, said Wednesday.

Emergency rooms are overwhelmed.

"We're like a series of pans of water, all connected and all nearly full," Fuller said. "Throw a bucket of water into one, and we'd all overflow."

The IOM report said among the problems are:
  • Emegency rooms are seriously overcrowded
  • Patients have to wait for a long time to be admitted
  • Ambulances are often turned away from emergency departments
  • A chronic shortage of specialists to provide care many emergency rooms
  • Ambulance transport to emergency medical services is generally fragmented, chaotic and inconsistent
To see the original press release and the IOM's original reports, visit the National Academies website.

| | | | | | |

Monday, June 05, 2006

Splenda -- How sweet it isn't: If artificial sugar is so splendid, how come we aren't thin?

Time magazine's current issue has an article about the dangers of Splenda you should read.

Here are some comments about Splenda and the call for hearings on its dangers, written by my friend Elwood Richard, founder of NOW Foods:

From El Richard:

Citizens for Health is asking for support for their petition for a public hearing on Splenda. I agree that objective technical information should be presented not only on Splenda, but every new chemical product that is introduced into our food supply. The Time magazine article (see link) gives some background on Splenda.

Splenda is one of the chemicals about which my biochemistry professor warned us. He said that the carbon chlorine bond is a very strong bond, and that as the carbon linked entity goes thru a host of reactions, the chlorine will remain attached in most of them. Eventually it is likely that some of the carbon chlorine bonded products will metabolize into one of the many toxic carbon chlorine compounds.

As with every novel chemical product that is proposed for introduction into our food supply, the firm owning the patent has a large financial interest in getting approval, and will have a good amount of contract research showing its safety. The public needs to be protected by having good independent research to assure that the contract research is valid.

A public hearing gives independent researchers a chance to be heard.

Elwood Richard, Founder
Now Foods

Read about Splenda at Citizens for Health

Read the Time article titled "How Sweet It Isn't: If artificial sugar is so splendid, why aren't we thin?"

| | | | | |

Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Three trains in, three trains out

You'd think that once you've heard something several hundred times, you'd get used to it, but that's not always the case.

One question I used to ask of my clients and patients is "How regular are you?" Even though more than a few women thought I was inquiring into their menstrual cycles, I still preferred asking the question this way instead of a more direct question like "How often do you poop?"

To provide health advice knowing the answer to the second question is important, but knowing the answer to the first question is even more important, as it provides a window into the mindset of the person with health issues.

It seems many people have no idea what "regular" should be, so they think that whatever is currently normal to them is "regular." I haven't had many people, even those who knew they were chronicly constipated, say there weren't "regular." They would answer the question with, "Oh, I go every other day," or "Once a week."

Usually I'd pry just a little bit further, and discover that their infrequent eliminations were indeed "regular" for not only them, but their entire household. Each time I talk to someone who thinks having a bowel movement every three to five days is "normal," I'm amazed, no matter how many times I hear it.

I know... modern medical authorities play down the need for regular, consistant bowel movements, and instead offer the "warm fuzzy" advice that "Whatever is regular with you is okay — if you feel you need help, try [insert name of over-the-counter laxative] for a few days."

But that's just not right. One early mentor of mine put it this way: "Three trains in... three trains out." If you eat a meal, you need to elimate the remains of a previous one. Otherwise, eventually, you're gonna have a back-up in the "train yard." When those trains get backed up, the toxic load that they're packing spills over, back into the bloodstream. Those food remnants that your body needs to eliminate end up poisoning you, over and over again. It's no wonder cancer is rampant, and colorectal cancer is the third-leading cancer-killer of women in the U.S.

Just think of all the chemicals, preservatives, artificial sweeteners, colors, etc., that most people consume each day. Soft drinks, doughnuts, coffee, hormone-saturated meats and milk... each item carries not only a "food value" (if it has any value at all), but also a toxic factor that your body was never meant to have to deal with.

Simply put, if you don't move that toxic sludge out of your system quickly, it is reintroduced through the colon wall back into your bloodstream, where the toxins are then carried throughout your body to lay seige against your organs and tissues, before finding their way back to the colon via the liver, your body's now-overworked poison-processor.

As you can imagine, it doesn't take long for constipation to cause your body to go into toxic overload.

Diets high in fiber and increased water consumption are the keys to avoiding constipation and toxic overload. If you're already constipated, you can begin to reverse the damage by using herbs for detoxification and by increasing your fiber and water intake. Avoid toxic foods, which, for starters, you should consider anything you can buy through a drive-through window.

Changing your lifestyle will change your bowel habits, which in turn will change your life for the better.


— David Ross, ND, CNHP

This article appeared in the May, 2006 In Touch newsletter

Monday, May 29, 2006

Lung cancer may be fueled by sex hormone estrogen

Lung cancer affects women with almost as much frequency as it does men, and it seems more non-smoker women may end up with lung cancer than non-smoker men.

Nearly 72,000 American women will die of lung cancer this year. That's more than are killed by breast, ovarian, uterine and cervical cancers combined.

Men's lung cancer rates have been steadily falling since 1991. Women's rates have stayed the same.

Why?

Dr. Kathy Albain, a lung cancer specialist at Loyola University Health System, and University of Pittsburgh pharmacologist Jill Siegfried, a pioneer in the field, think they know the answer.

Estrogen.

These researchers believe estrogen may act as a fuel for lung tumors just like it does for many breast tumors, and that blocking estrogen with the same drugs that breast cancer patients use might also work in the lungs.

An alternative to drugs to reduce unchecked estrogens in a woman's body may be as simple as rubbing a cream containing progesterone onto her skin. Progesterone is the "other" sex hormone, the one that men and women both share.

Research has shown that many estrogen-caused diseases in women may be slowed or eliminated with a progesterone regimen.

I've personally seen dozens of women find benefit in using a progesterone cream to stop insomnia, night sweats, moodiness and other PMS and menopause symptoms, as well as to balance blood sugar irregularities.

Progesterone cream should be purchased in a tube, not a jar, as excess air and light may cause the naturally-occuring hormone to break down prematurely. Progesterone cream is available over-the-counter without a prescription.

| | | | | | | |

Sunday, May 28, 2006

Doctor donates blood to his own patient during surgery

This heart-warming story just crossed my desk and made me smile.

A heart surgeon on a mercy-mission in El Salvador stopped surgery on his eight-year old patient so he could donate his own rare-type blood.

Dr. Samuel Weinstein said he had his blood drawn, ate a Pop-Tart and returned to the operating table about 20 minutes later to watch as his blood helped the boy survive the complex surgery.

"It was a little bit surreal," Weinstein said Friday from the Children's Hospital at Montefiore Medical Center in New York, where he is chief of pediatric cardio-thoracic surgery.

Bravo, Doctor! Bravo!

Dr. Weinstein was in the news last winter, too. He and his associates performed heart surgery of four seriously ill Iraqi children.

| | | | | |

Saturated fats not only affect cholesterol levels, but can raise risk of diabetes and cancer

Experts have warned for years that we should eat less saturated fat, which has a direct relationship to LDL ("bad") blood cholesterol and the risk of heart disease.

Research now suggests tha saturated fat also affects insulin function, potentially raising the risk of diabetes, cancer, ovarian disorders and other health problems.

| | | | | | | | |

A drink a day keeps the cardiologist away

Daily alcohol consumption reduced the risk of of heart disease for men by an amazing 41%, a recent study of more than 50,000 people found. But interestingly, only for men.

Women's risks were reduced by drinking, but oddly, it made no difference if they had one drink, or if they drank every day. Their risk of heart disease went down 36%.

Once a week male drinkers cut their chances of heart disease by only seven percent.

The findings were published in the British Medical Journal. The Danish researches said this ndicates the amount of alcohol consumed is more important than drinking frequency.

Professor Morten Gronbaek, of the Centre for Alcohol Research, Copenhagen, said: "Among women alcohol intake may be the primary determinant of the inverse association between drinking alcohol and risk of coronary heart disease whereas among men, drinking frequency, not alcohol intake, seems more important.

"A limitation of our study is that only 35% of the invited people participated. People who choose to participate may have a different risk profile and be in better health than those who decline. However, the observed incidence of coronary heart disease did not differ from that of the general population."

| | | | | | |

Friday, April 07, 2006

AIDS: Wishing it away

Two AIDS stories in the news today come crashing together.

CNN reports that a growing shortage of doctors, nurses and medical workers is hampering the fight against AIDS in the developing world. The 209-page annual World Health Report from the World Health Organization says that "the global shortage approaches 4.3 million health workers."

Meanwhile, the 87-page report from the U.S. Government Accounting Office looking into the $15 billion U.S.-funded "President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)" blasted the fact that most of the money is being spent on a required "ABC" strategy that encourages abstinence until marriage, being faithful thereafter and using condoms in high-risk sexual encounters, says the San Jose Mercury News. Critics say the abstinence program is eroding other preventative programs.

Most of the 20 countries receiving the PEPFAR money reports that the required ABC strategy is hampering their efforts and "presents challenges to their ability to respond to the local epidemiology and cultural and social norms."

The abstinence "policy is basically unworkable. This shows the problem very clearly and starkly," said Paul Zeitz, director of the Global AIDS Alliance.

Fifteen billion U.S. tax dollars to tell people in other countries they shouldn't have sex. It's a crazy world we live in!

| | | | | | | | |

Living together makes women fatter, men healthier

Co-habiting seems to make men healthier, and women fatter, studies from the U.K. and Australia have shown.

After moving in together, men tend to eat healthier, leaner foods, while women tend to gravitate towards creamier, more fatty foods. Men begin to eat not only less meat, but less food generally. Women do the opposite. The BBC reported that the researchers said each partner is tries to please the other, moving more towards the partner's former eating preferences.

A U.S. study of 9,043 women showed that marriage itself is a leads to weight gain, and getting out of a marriage leads to weight loss.

| | | | | | | | |

Fluoride causes cancer: Colgate's dental editor accused of fudging study results

I've been talking for years about the dangers of fluoridation, and also about the dangers inherent in allowing medical and research people who work for private companies to also publish in medical journals.

This week brings us a story that combines the worst of both issues.

A Harvard-related journal on Wednesday published a study that indicates that young boys who drink fluoridated tap water are at greater risk for a rare bone cancer.

The study is expected to intensify debate over fluoridation and mean more scrutiny for Harvard's Dr. Chester Douglass, who has been accused of doctoring the findings to downplay a cancer link.

"It’s the best piece of work ever linking fluoride in tap water and bone cancer. It’s pretty damning for him [Douglass]," said Richard Wiles of the Environmental Working Group, which filed a complaint with the National Institutes of Health against Douglass.

Douglass, who is an epidemiology professor at Harvard’s School of Dental Medicine, moonlights as as a paid editor of the Colgate Oral Care Report, a newsletter supported by the toothpaste maker. Talk about a conflict of interest!

The National Institutes of Health, which provided Douglass and his students a $1 million grant, and Harvard are investigating whether Douglass misrepresented research findings last year when he said there was no link between ingested fluoride and bone cancer, despite extensive research to the contrary by one of his doctoral students.

That student, Dr. Elise Bassin, wrote in yesterday’s Cancer Causes and Control that boys who drink water with levels of fluoride considered safe by federal guidlines are five times more likely to develop osteosarcoma than boys who drink unfluoridated water, the Boston Herald reported.

Douglass wrote a letter to the editor, which was published in the same issue, downplaying Bassin's study, calling it a "partial view of this ongoing study," and urging readers to be "especially cautious" when interpreting the findings. It's a blatant attempt at sleight of hand. Apparently, he's not a very good magician, though, because most everyone can see through this.

| | | | | | | | | |

Prevent breast and ovarian cancer with soy, fruits, and green tea, say new studies

Soybeans, fruits and green tea contain powerful antioxidants that help reduce a woman's risk for breast and ovarian cancer, according to studies presented at this week's annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research.

Also it's now "official": Vitamin D lowers risks for these cancers.

As expected, because it's SO typical, cancer doctors tried to downplay the results of the studies: "None of the four studies warrant a public health change," Dr. Rowan Chlebowski, a medial oncologist at the Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center in Torrance, Calif.

Read more....

| | | | | | |

Monday, April 03, 2006

Doublespeak: Doctor says "vaccine is working" though 80% of those with mumps were vaccinated

A mumps epidemic is sweeping across the Midwest, especially hitting hard in Iowa and Nebraska. Sixty-six percent of those who have been diagnosed with mumps have been fully vaccinated for mumps, and another 14 percent have received at least one dose of the vaccine. It's hitting across all ages and social levels.

Yet in a near-perfect rendition of Orwellian doublespeak, Dr. Patricia Quinlisk, Iowa's state epidemiologist, says, "The vaccine is working. The vaccine certainly was made to cover this particular strain, because it's a fairly common strain of mumps." She said the vaccine is 95% effective.

In spite of evidence to the contrary, that 80% of those sick have been vaccinated, she said, "The vaccine is working. It's 95% effective."

Read the article....

| | | | | | |

Saturday, March 18, 2006

Chili peppers kill prostate cancer


A recent article in the U.S. medical journal Cancer Research reports that capsaicin, the ingredient in hot chili peppers — habanero and jalapeno — that makes them hot, kills up to 80% of prostate cancer cells, and that tumors treated with capsaicin were smaller than those not so treated, the BBC reports.

Said Dr. Soren Lehmann, who led the study: "Capsaicin had a profound anti-proliferative effect on human prostate cancer cells in culture. It also dramatically slowed the development of prostate tumours."

Yet, believe it or not, the "Prostate Cancer Charity" in the UK responded to the news by saying, "...we caution men with prostate cancer in the UK against upping their weekly intake of the hottest known chilis."

Chris Hiley, head of policy and research at The Prostate Cancer Charity, added: "...For now, if men with prostate cancer want to improve their diet they should avoid fatty foods, eat less red and processed meat, increase their fish intake and enjoy a wide and plentiful range of fruit and vegetables every day."

Why? Because there is no "approved drug" made from capsaicin. It's just more proof that the medical profession doesn't want you well. They want you just sick enough that you have to take their overpriced and often dangerous medicines.

Think I'm exaggerating? Here's more from Hiley: ""This is interesting laboratory-based work on cells but we don't yet know how, if at all, it might help men with prostate cancer. Eventually, it may be possible to extract the capsaicin and make it available as a drug treatment. But for now... [insert quote from two paragraphs up].

The industry doesn't want you visiting your local herb shop for a $10 bottle of capsicum / capsaicin / pepper pills, or growing your own hot peppers in your garden. They want you hooked on $200 a month pharmaceuticals.

| |
| |

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Drug trials critically injure volunteers


Six men are in serious or critical condition today after suffering violent reactions on Monday while taking part in pharmaceutical drug research. They remain in the intensive care unit of Northwick Park Hospital in London, reports the BBC.

Drug-maker TeGenero AG yesterday told family members yesterday that a dog had died in preliminary tests, and today denied that report, says lawyer Ann Alexander, who represents one of the sickened men.

Ms Alexander added: "These are ordinary health people who have been involved in a clinical trial and unfortunately everything seems to have gone wrong. I think the most scary thing for the families... is that they don't know what the outcome is going to be."

TeGenero called the reactions to their drug TBN1412 "shocking developments." The drug is designed to treat rheumatoid arthritis and leukaemia. This is the first time it has been tested on humans.

All six volunteers had to be admitted to intensive care within hours of taking the drug. One patient was described as lifeless, unable to move, and puffed up "like the Elephant Man."

Monday, March 13, 2006

Demonization of kava kava continues


Do-gooders are now blaming unemployment and "lazyness" among aboriginal Australians on the use of the relaxing herb kava kava.

Though tribal leaders say alcohol and hard drugs are much more serious problems among the aborigines, reformers are using buzzwords such as "dangerous" and "dreadful problem" in discussing kava kava.

"The impact of kava on some communities is similar to alcohol and drugs," a government health adviser says. "People feel dispossessed, are unemployed, have a lack of education and look to substances to occupy themselves. It affects our young people mentally and physically."

Is he saying kava is the problem, or that the rampant depression over unemployment and lack of education lead people to use kava as a means of temporary escape? I guess they'd rather people face up to their horrible poverty with a clear mind.

| |
| |

Red wine prevents tooth loss, gum disease


Drink up!

Wine is good for your teeth and gums, according to research scientists as University Laval in Quebec, Canada.

Red wine contains antioxidants known as polyphenols, which are already known to reduce cholesterol. It is now also believed polyphenols prevent gum disease by reducing inflammation that arises from periodontitis.

Periodontitis is a common cause of tooth loss because it affects the bones as well as the gums, loosening teeth.

| |
| |

Aspirin-Plavix combination ineffective at preventing heart disease, stroke


A major study has found no benefit, and perhaps harm, from mixing the anti-clotting drug Plavix to aspirin.

Plavix alone has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of a second heart attack, so it was assumed adding asprin to the regimen would further decrease the chance of another heart attack.

A trial involving more than 15,000 high-risk patients showed there was no benefit from the combination, researchers report.

"The absence of a clear benefit, in terms of clinical outcome, coupled with the increased rate of bleeding... argues against the use of dual therapy in this patient population," wrote Dr. Marc Pfeffer of Harvard Medical School and Dr. John Jarcho of Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston.

| |
| |

Mad Cow found in Alabama


A cow from an Alabama farm that had tested "inconclusive" over the weeked for Mad Cow Disease was today confirmed positive for the illness.

"We received a positive result from a Western Blot Confirmatory test conducted at our USDA laboratories in Ames, Iowa, on samples from an animal that had tested inconclusive on a rapid screening test performed on Friday, March 10," said John Clifford, chief veterinary officer of the U.S. Agriculture Department's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.

Wikipedia says Mad Cow Disease, or Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), is a fatal, neurodegenerative disease of cattle, which infects by a mechanism that surprised biologists on its discovery in late 20th century. The disease is not spread by microbes as are most diseases, but by a protein. People can contract the disease; it is thought to be the cause of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD), sometimes called new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (nvCJD), a human brain-wasting disease.

Transmission can occur when healthy animals consume tainted tissues from others with the disease. In the brain these proteins cause native cellular prion protein to deform into the infectious state which then goes on to deform further prion protein in an exponential cascade. These aggregate to form dense plaque fibers, which lead to the microscopic appearance of "holes" in the brain, degeneration of physical and mental abilities and ultimately death.

|
| | |